What’s in this article
- What are affirmative covenants?
- What are negative covenants?
- What are financial covenants?
- Closing thought
In the modern financing landscape, it has become increasingly clear that not all credit is equal. While a dollar of principal may look identical on a balance sheet, the underlying architecture of the loan determines the true balance of power between the borrower and the lender. Covenants are the “rules of the road”; they define the operational boundaries of a company and serve as the primary barometer for the strength of a credit.
In the broadly syndicated loan (BSL) market, the trend has shifted toward “covenant-lite” structures, prioritizing borrower flexibility and market liquidity. This has been noted in the high yield (HY) market as well, where most of the market is now covenant-lite. Investment-grade (IG) credit usually sees no covenants at all, with some HY debt also falling into this category. On the other hand, the private credit market has built its value proposition on “covenant-heavy” or maintenance-based protections. These aren’t just technical nuances; they represent two entirely different philosophies of risk management. Where tradeable corporate credit offers a long leash and a hands-off approach, private credit utilizes tight financial guardrails to ensure that lenders have a seat at the table the moment a business begins to veer off course.
Understanding the delta between these structures is essential for any investor navigating the complexities of the current credit cycle.
What are affirmative covenants?
These are the standard administrative requirements. In both BSL and private credit markets, these are fairly similar, but the reporting timeline is the differentiator. Such covenants include requirements to pay taxes, maintain insurance, and provide financial statements to name a few. However, the typical BSL lender base allows for a longer ‘grace period’ for reporting (e.g., 120 days for annual audits). Private credit lenders demand much faster visibility (e.g., 90 days for audits, 30–45 days for monthly management accounts). Because private credit lenders are often the sole source of capital, they want to see a dip in performance in real-time.
What are negative covenants?
These restrict the company’s ability to take actions that might hurt the lender and is where the structural tug-of-war over ‘covenant-lite’ status is most evident. Limits on indebtedness (adding more debt), liens (pledging assets to others), and restricted payments (paying dividends to owners) are some of the widely used negative covenants. The Broadly Syndicated Loan market uses “incurrence-based” tests and large “baskets.” A borrower can often take on significant new debt as long as they don’t exceed a specific leverage ratio at the moment they borrow it. Private credit uses tighter, “hard-capped” baskets. Any significant move, like a major acquisition or a dividend payout, generally requires a formal amendment or a specific “consent” from the lender group.
What are financial covenants?
To truly understand the divergence between these two asset classes, one must look at Financial Covenants, which function as the “vital signs” monitor of a loan. The distinction here is not merely technical; it is the difference between a lender who is an active participant and one who is a passive observer.
Financial covenants are generally numerical ratios (e.g., Debt/EBITDA) that measure the company’s financial stability.
In private credit, the gold standard is the “maintenance” covenant. These are tested religiously at the end of every fiscal quarter. If a borrower’s leverage ratio (total debt / EBITDA) exceeds a negotiated ceiling—even by a fraction—a “technical default” occurs. This is the ultimate defensive tool; it acts as a tripwire that forces the borrower back to the table while they still have enough liquidity to course-correct. It ensures that the lender has a voice in the room long before a bankruptcy filing becomes inevitable. Furthermore, to the extent these maintenance covenants are structured tightly, these technical defaults can allow for the lender making incremental returns, in addition to making out of the situation unscathed.
Conversely, the Broadly Syndicated Loan market has almost entirely moved toward Incurrence Covenants. Under this regime, the “vital signs” are only checked if the borrower chooses to take a specific action, such as issuing new debt or making a massive acquisition. If a company’s performance simply rots from within—meaning their EBITDA drops while their debt stays the same—they can remain in “compliance” despite being functionally insolvent. In the BSL world, the borrower is granted an enormous amount of “runway,” but for the lender, that runway often leads to a much harder landing and lower recovery rates when the cycle turns.
While not every private credit loan follows the same level of rigor, with large sponsor deals getting less covenants, the market generally is more protected than its BSL, HY and IG competition.
Closing thought
Ultimately, covenant design is not a technical footnote; it defines how risk is governed. For investors navigating today’s credit markets, understanding that framework is as important as analysing leverage, spread, or sector exposure.
Acknowledgment and Disclaimers
The materials contained herein are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any interest in any investment vehicles.
Statements contained herein reflect the subjective views and opinion of Sagard and may not be able to be independently verified. These materials are being provided solely for informational purposes and are not intended to be, and shall not be regarded or construed as, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services, nor as a recommendation for a transaction or investment, including without limitation an offer to purchase, sell or hold any security investment, loan or other financial product or to enter into or arrange any type of transaction. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Sagard shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.
Like all investments, an investment in private markets involves the risk of loss. Investment products such as private market investments are designed only for sophisticated investors who can sustain the loss of their investment. Accordingly, such investment products are not suitable for all investors. Private market investments are not subject to the same or similar regulatory requirements as mutual funds or other more regulated collective investment vehicles.
Certain statements and certain of the information contained in these materials represents or is based upon “forward-looking” statements or information based on experience and expectations about these types of investments. The forward-looking statements in these materials include statements with respect to, among other things, projections, forecasts or estimates of cash flows, yields or returns, scenario analyses or proposed or expected portfolio composition and anticipated future events, performance or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to many risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to any forward-looking statements and information and no undue reliance should be placed on such forward-looking statements and information. Sagard has no obligation and does not undertake to revise or update these materials or any forward-looking statements set forth herein, except as required by law.
The information in the attached materials reflects the general intentions of Sagard. There can be no assurance that these intentions will not change or be adjusted to reflect the environment in which Sagard will operate.
Past performance and historic information is not necessarily indicative of future activities or returns, and there can be no assurance that comparable results will be achieved.
No securities commission or regulatory authority in Canada has in any way passed upon the merits of an investment in private markets or the accuracy or adequacy of the information or material contained herein or otherwise.
The information contained herein is in summary form for convenience of presentation. It is not complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Sagard makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein.
All information is presented as of February 2026 unless otherwise stated.
Sagard Holdings Manager (Canada) Inc. is registered as an exempt market dealer in the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia. The Ontario Securities Commission is the Principal Regulator of Sagard Holdings Manager (Canada) Inc.
